Company profile
Be the first to review this provider.
Write a review
editorial.link
Every fact on this page names its source and the date it was checked. Where a claim cannot be supported, it does not appear.
Editorial.Link is a managed link-building agency at editorial.link. It sells editorial placements on publisher sites it says do not list links for sale, plus broken-link building, linkable assets, brand mentions, listicle features, digital PR, and white-label fulfilment for SEO agencies. Buyers review prospect lists before outreach, can order a trial link before signing, and receive a report after links go live.
The company presents the work as relationship-based and white-hat, with a personal account manager and a six-month replacement if a link disappears. Official pages state an average Domain Rating of 67 for placements and published prices from $375 per link; those figures, client logos, and placement counts are vendor statements.
Official about copy says the brand launched in 2020 from media publisher Admix Global, which the company dates to 2016. Terms describe Editorial.Link as a European company that issues VAT invoices, while the contact page lists a St. Petersburg, Florida address. Those two self-descriptions are recorded as published and are not collapsed into a single registered-office fact.
Link-building services the company names on its own site, checked 2026-08-29. Catalogues change, so treat the list as dated.
SourceThe official Editorial.Link websiteThe Editorial.Link white-label page
PBS scores the provider as an organisation for a buyer, regardless of which service page is being ranked.
Score
54.4 of 100
Last scored 6 September 2026
| ID | Criterion | Weight | Score |
|---|---|---|---|
| B1 | Deliverable quality and buyer fit | 25% | 68.2 |
| B2 | Value for money | 20% | 14.9 |
| B3 | Delivery reliability and buyer protection | 15% | 65.0 |
| B4 | Customer reviews | 15% | 65.2 |
| B5 | Managed service, support, and buyer control | 10% | 71.0 |
| B6 | Commercial terms and flexibility | 7% | 54.5 |
| B7 | Reporting and transparency | 5% | 45.0 |
| B8 | Continuity and capacity | 3% | 58.2 |
| Weighted total | 54.4 | ||
Editorial.Link scored 54.4 of 100 under M1.3. The scoring run date is 6 September 2026. Evidence was admitted through 2026-09-06. This page shows 6 sources.
Editorial.Link offers strong buyer control for a premium price. Every client is promised a personal account manager, and buyers review the proposed publishers and their figures before any outreach begins, which lifted its score for service and buyer control. Prices are public: $375 for one link and $1,750 for five, with no multi-month tie-in on those cards. The terms treat placements as permanent and require the provider to restore or replace a removed link, and the first batch is promised within seven days of approval.
Price and inconsistent paperwork are the limits. At $350 to $375 a link the cost sits well above our benchmark for comparable services, which gave it a low value score. Who a buyer actually contracts with is unclear: the terms describe a European company issuing VAT invoices, while the contact and privacy pages name a Florida company, and no registration number is published. The replacement promise is described three different ways, and the terms say nothing about ordinary cancellation, payment timing or refunds.
Published rankings on this site that include Editorial.Link, with the position and scores as published.
Relative SFS position: 48.8 of 100, averaged across 11 eligible published rankings.
Rank 6 of 10 rated providers
Listed on /services/link-building-services/
Service Fit Score (SFS)
68.0
Overall Score (OS)
60.8
Score date
2026-09-03
Methodology version
M1.3
Evidence cutoff
2026-08-31
Tied at rank 8 of 10 rated providers
Listed on /industries/automotive/
Service Fit Score (SFS)
67.4
Overall Score (OS)
60.6
Score date
2026-09-09
Methodology version
M1.3
Evidence cutoff
2026-09-05
Tied at rank 8 of 10 rated providers
Listed on /industries/b2b/
Service Fit Score (SFS)
67.7
Overall Score (OS)
60.7
Score date
2026-09-05
Methodology version
M1.3
Evidence cutoff
2026-09-05
Rank 7 of 10 rated providers
Listed on /services/guest-posting/
Service Fit Score (SFS)
63.8
Overall Score (OS)
59.0
Score date
2026-09-09
Methodology version
M1.3
Evidence cutoff
2026-08-31
Tied at rank 7 of 10 rated providers
Listed on /services/high-authority-links/
Service Fit Score (SFS)
90.1
Overall Score (OS)
70.0
Score date
2026-09-09
Methodology version
M1.3
Evidence cutoff
2026-09-03
Tied at rank 8 of 9 rated providers
Listed on /industries/insurance/
Service Fit Score (SFS)
58.5
Overall Score (OS)
56.4
Score date
2026-09-06
Methodology version
M1.3
Evidence cutoff
2026-09-06
Rank 9 of 10 rated providers
Listed on /services/link-building-packages/
Service Fit Score (SFS)
72.0
Overall Score (OS)
62.6
Score date
2026-09-05
Methodology version
M1.3
Evidence cutoff
2026-09-05
Rank 5 of 10 rated providers
Listed on /services/niche-edits/
Service Fit Score (SFS)
88.1
Overall Score (OS)
69.3
Score date
2026-09-09
Methodology version
M1.3
Evidence cutoff
2026-09-03
Rank 9 of 10 rated providers
Listed on /industries/saas/
Service Fit Score (SFS)
69.6
Overall Score (OS)
61.6
Score date
2026-09-05
Methodology version
M1.3
Evidence cutoff
2026-09-05
Tied at rank 8 of 10 rated providers
Listed on /industries/travel/
Service Fit Score (SFS)
64.5
Overall Score (OS)
59.2
Score date
2026-09-06
Methodology version
M1.3
Evidence cutoff
2026-09-06
Rank 8 of 10 rated providers
Listed on /services/white-label-link-building/
Service Fit Score (SFS)
67.5
Overall Score (OS)
60.6
Score date
2026-09-05
Methodology version
M1.3
Evidence cutoff
2026-09-05
How the position is calculated: on each eligible ranking, rated providers are ordered by Service Fit Score only. That order is converted to a 0–100 value, and the values are averaged equally across the company's appearances. Rankings that do not include the company are omitted from the average.
Equal Service Fit Scores share the average of the positions they cover. A gap under 0.5 points is a tie: shared rank, alphabetical order, no hidden tie-breaker.
Each fact below comes from a primary source, such as the company's own pages or a public register, and was checked on 2026-08-29.
Legal identity
Brand name Editorial.Link. Official schema also uses the legal name Editorial Link LLC. Official terms describe the operator as a European company that issues VAT invoices.
SourceThe official Editorial.Link websiteThe Editorial.Link terms of service
Published contact address
Published contact address: 7901 4th St N, Ste 300, St. Petersburg, FL 33702. This is the address on the official contact page, not independently confirmed as a registered office.
Operating model
The company's own description of its model: managed editorial placements with prospect pre-approval, an optional trial link, payment after first links go live, a personal account manager, and white-label reporting for agencies.
SourceThe official Editorial.Link websiteThe Editorial.Link white-label page
In the company's terms
Official terms state that delivered links are dofollow and treated as permanent, with reinstatement or substitution if a link is removed, and that courts in the European Union have exclusive jurisdiction.
The primary sources behind the facts on this page.
If you represent this provider or have reliable evidence, you can ask us to correct its website, services, company details, sources or other factual information. Every request is checked before the public record changes.