Link Building RankingsHow we rank
Link Building Rankings
MenuClose

Best Logistics & Supply Chain Link Building Services — 2026 Ranked

Click Intelligence ranks first for logistics link building in 2026, with Version and B2BSEO.io next on fulfilment delivery and channel depth. Only one provider shows a current unit price, so compare placement control, outlet classes and remedy terms before budgets.

Published: 2026-09-06Updated: 2026-09-06Evidence cutoff: 2026-09-06Methodology: M1.3

Click Intelligence is the best logistics link building service for 2026. Its dedicated transport, logistics and freight offer pairs a defined per-placement Blogger Outreach unit — £70 per DR20+ placement with optional site pre-approval — with local and international SEO, a combination none of the other five matches end to end.[1][2][4]

The six divide into three shapes. B2BSEO.io and Link Building HQ specify the logistics channel itself — trade publications, supply-chain associations and directories — with Link Building HQ reporting a 3PL campaign behind the claim. Version sells vertical editorial backlinks into fulfilment capability pages off a named 3PL case, Searchbloom wraps links inside broader quoted search programmes, and Ranko Media offers monthly white-hat outreach from a dedicated logistics page.[8][9][12][15][17]

Only Click Intelligence shows a rendered unit price, so treat every other budget as a range until a quote returns. Approval rights differ more than the headlines suggest — pre-approval is a stated option in one place only — and every case figure on this page is a provider report, not an independent test. Compare control, outlets and remedy first.[2][4][9][12]

Comparison

Scroll the table sideways for the remaining columns. Rank and provider stay in place.

RankProviderOfficial siteProfilePBSSFSOSBest forLogistics deliveryCurrent price / scopeCommitmentPlacement controlTimingLink remedy
1Click IntelligenceHomepageProfile73.057.464.7

Transport firms ordering industry blogger outreach[1][2]

Blogger outreach and guest articles for transport, logistics and freight[1][2]

£70 per DR20+ placement; logistics scope to confirm[4]

Per-placement shop order; monthly contracts 30-day notice in prior terms (reopen at order)[4][5]

Optional pre-approval of sites and content[2][4]

Logistics deadline not established[1]

Shop lifetime guarantee and money-back up to 10 placements; terms conflict to confirm[4][5]

2VersionHomepageProfile61.064.562.7

Fulfilment 3PLs buying vertical editorial backlinks[12]

Vertical editorial backlinks into 3PL capability pages[12]

Exact price unavailable[12]

Quote-led; monthly cadence described[12]

Approval not established[12]

Not established[12]

Not established[12]

3B2BSEO.ioHomepageProfile57.066.461.5

Carriers mapping links to lanes and associations[15]

Logistics SEO with industry PR and association and directory links[15]

Exact price unavailable[15]

Quote-led[15]

Approval not established[15]

Not established[15]

Not established[15]

4Link Building HQHomepageProfile55.565.460.3

3PL platforms needing association and trade-press links[9]

Editorial outreach including associations and trade publications[9][11]

Exact price unavailable[11]

No minimum, no contract as published[11]

Approval not established[11]

Not established[11]

1-year replacement as published[11]

5SearchbloomHomepageProfile62.755.659.1

Logistics brands bundling links into search programmes[7][8]

Custom industry-relevant links and digital PR[7][8]

Exact price unavailable[8]

Quote-led search engagement[8]

Approval not established[8]

Not established[8]

Not established[8]

6Ranko MediaHomepageProfile55.554.555.0

Logistics sites commissioning white-hat outreach[17]

White-hat outreach and digital PR for logistics sites[17]

Exact price unavailable[17]

Monthly outreach as described[17]

PM visibility; site approval not established[17]

Not established[17]

Not established[17]

Detailed reviews

Rank 1

Click Intelligence

PBS 73.0SFS 57.4OS 64.7Trustpilot 4.0/5 from 4 reviews, as of 05/09/2026
Click Intelligence logo
Best for

Transport firms ordering industry blogger outreach[1][2]

Introduction

Click Intelligence sells SEO and PPC to transport, logistics and freight companies, fulfilled through its Blogger Outreach programme of relationship-based manual outreach and unique articles. Order single DR-banded placements from the live shop, starting at DR20+ sites with 50 to 1,000 monthly visitors, and add site and content pre-approval when the order needs it.[1][2][3][4]

What they do

A dedicated transport, logistics and freight page scopes the work, and Blogger Outreach fulfils it: manual outreach places guest articles on relevant-industry sites, with the buyer choosing DR bands and an approval or non-approval route at checkout. Local and international SEO on the same industry page extend the same outreach to multi-market operators.[1][2][4]

Our verdict

We recommend Click Intelligence for most small and medium businesses and agencies that want a defined logistics outreach unit they can buy per placement. The dedicated industry page, live DR-banded shop and optional pre-approval of sites and content cover the standard buying situation better than anything else on this page, and local plus international SEO sit in the same offer. The decisive trade-off is channel depth: the industry page promises relevant-industry sites without naming trade-press, association or data-report targets, and lane-page strategy is left to the buyer — so confirm outlet classes and destination pages in writing before ordering.[1][2][4]

Strengths

  • An explicit transport, logistics and freight service page paired with a live priced outreach shop — the only defined per-placement unit on this page.[1][4]
  • Local and international SEO listed on the same industry page, so multi-market operators start covered.[1]
  • Optional pre-approval of sites and content, chosen at order stage.[2][4]

Limitations

  • No named logistics client, trade-publication class or lane-page targeting appears on the industry page.[1]
  • The shop’s money-back promise on up to 10 placements sits against terms that emphasise non-refundable fees in the extract read — have the order restate which wording governs.[4][5]
  • The shop shows a lifetime link guarantee, but the terms extract ended before the replacement clauses, so the remedy scope is unconfirmed.[4][5]

Price and engagement

£70 per DR20+ non-approval placement for 1–24 units, falling to £65 and £60 at higher volumes; approval is a separate toggle.[4]

The shop shows GBP; confirm billing currency, VAT and non-UK treatment on the written invoice before paying.[4]

No logistics first-placement deadline is published on the industry page.[1]

Scope on the industry page, buy in the shop

Confirm transport or freight scope on the industry page, then buy through the per-placement shop: the DR band and the approval toggle are the two decisions that shape what arrives.[1][4]

Start at DR20+ for volume and climb the bands only for pages that must move quickly; higher bands raise the per-placement figure without changing the approval choice.[4]

Take approval when pages carry claims

Where lane, quote or licensed-brokerage pages must stay accurate, pay for the approval route and review sites and content before placement; the non-approval route offers no such review.[2][4]

Read third-party listicles as leads

The provider’s logistics listicle names other agencies, but a listicle mention is not evidence those agencies serve freight or 3PL buyers — shortlist from assessed providers with first-party logistics pages instead.[6]

Official homepageCompany profile
Rank 2

Version

PBS 61.0SFS 64.5OS 62.7
Version logo
Best for

Fulfilment 3PLs buying vertical editorial backlinks[12]

Introduction

Version sells logistics SEO across 3PL, freight, warehousing, supply chain and customs, built on vertical editorial backlinks. Its Ship With Mina case describes a China-based Shopify and direct-to-consumer 3PL gaining vertical backlinks on logistics and ecommerce publications from August 2024. The BTGP method places contextual links inside ranking content with roundup outreach, at 8 to 14 placements a month depending on budget and weighted to capability pages.[12]

What they do

Vertical editorial backlinks for 3PL and freight capability pages, sold alongside web SEO and AI search programmes from the same agency.[12][13]

Our verdict

We recommend Version for fulfilment and 3PL brands that want editorial placements aimed at capability pages rather than the homepage. A named fulfilment client, capability-page weighting and multi-market expansion across the US, UK, Canada and Australia make the delivery story concrete. The trade-off is breadth: the programme is full SEO plus backlinks, and the site still presents health, software and ecommerce beside logistics — so confirm the placement count, destinations and measurement in the order.[12][14]

Strengths

  • A named fulfilment client with links weighted to capability pages, not the homepage.[12]
  • Multi-market expansion across the US, UK, Canada and Australia described on the case.[12]

Limitations

  • Ranking and citation outcomes are provider reports, not independent tests.[12]
  • No price is published, and the site presents the agency through its founder without naming a contracting entity — confirm both in the order.[13][14]
  • Reddit work on the case is distribution, not link placement — judge the offer on its editorial backlinks.[12]

Price and engagement

Exact public price unavailable; the page describes 8 to 14 placements a month depending on budget, which is a cadence illustration rather than a guaranteed quota.[12]

Weight links to capability pages

Direct the campaign at fulfilment and freight capability pages rather than the homepage, matching the case’s weighting.[12]

Ask how roundup outreach and BTGP insertions split across the monthly cadence, so capability pages get the weight the case describes.[12]

Attribute the case claims

Read the Ship With Mina ranking and AI-citation claims as provider reports and agree independent measurement for your own pages.[12]

Official homepageCompany profile
Rank 3

B2BSEO.io

PBS 57.0SFS 66.4OS 61.5
B2BSEO.io logo
Best for

Carriers mapping links to lanes and associations[15]

Introduction

B2BSEO.io sells logistics SEO to carriers, 3PLs, warehouses and last-mile and fulfilment operators, with a Link-Building and Industry PR line covering logistics publications, association, partner and directory links, expert quotes, trade-publication placements and competitor gap analysis. Local and route-based SEO around ports, hubs and service areas backs the same commercial pages the links point to.[15]

What they do

RFQ-driven logistics SEO: link building and industry PR plus a content plan of shipping guides, freight-cost and compliance material with internal links into service pages.[15]

Our verdict

We recommend B2BSEO.io for carriers and 3PLs that want links mapped to lanes, locations and quote-intent pages rather than aimed at the homepage. Its published channel list — publications, associations, directories, partner mentions and digital PR — is the strongest logistics specification on this page. The trade-off is proof: the homepage shows other B2B brands rather than named logistics clients, and price, approval and remedy are unpublished, so make the proposal name outlets, destinations and terms before committing.[15][16]

Strengths

  • A channel list that matches the logistics playbook: logistics publications, associations, directories, partner mentions and digital PR.[15]
  • A content plan naming shipping guides, freight cost and compliance, wired to service pages by internal links.[15]

Limitations

  • No named logistics case appears on the pages read; homepage proof points are other B2B brands.[15][16]
  • Exact price, commitment, approval and remedy are unpublished.[15]
  • The contact page did not load on the read date and no contracting entity is named — confirm both in writing.[16]

Price and engagement

Exact public price unavailable; engagement is quote-led.[15]

Name outlets before ordering

Ask the provider to name the association and trade-publication classes from its channel list in the ordered scope, rather than accepting the list as a promise.[15]

Pin the content too: shipping guides and freight-cost pieces should carry your operating facts, not generic filler, before they go to trade editors.[15]

Bring lanes and quote pages

Supply lane, warehouse and quote URLs up front; the page describes those commercial intents, and links aimed elsewhere waste the channel strength.[15]

Official homepageCompany profile
Rank 4

Link Building HQ

PBS 55.5SFS 65.4OS 60.3
Link Building HQ logo
Best for

3PL platforms needing association and trade-press links[9]

Introduction

Link Building HQ reports a 3PL matching-platform campaign that secured 75 links from industry publications, supply chain associations and business directories while targeting supply chain management and freight forwarding terms. The current offer is white-label editorial outreach with no PBNs, no minimum order and no contract, backed by a one-year replacement promise.[9][10][11]

What they do

Editorial outreach that secures backlinks from industry publications, supply chain associations and directories, run as white-label fulfilment with live dashboard tracking.[9][10][11]

Our verdict

We recommend Link Building HQ for 3PL platforms that want association and trade-press links with a demonstrated campaign behind them. Securing 75 association and trade-press links for a matching platform, plus geo landing pages for local logistics queries, is the strongest association-led delivery story on this page. The trade-off is attribution: the client is unnamed and the traffic and ranking figures are provider reports, while the current product is agency white-label rather than a logistics-only service — so confirm association targeting in the ordered scope.[9][11]

Strengths

  • Associations plus trade publications — the exact channel mix logistics buyers need.[9]
  • Geo landing pages aimed at local logistics queries.[9]

Limitations

  • The client is unnamed and the link, traffic and ranking figures are provider reports, not independent tests.[9]
  • The case page shows an Orlando address and email with no contracting entity named — confirm the contracting party in writing.[9]

Price and engagement

Exact public price unavailable.[11]

No minimum and no contract are published, with a one-year replacement promise.[11]

Read the case as a report

Treat the 75-link, traffic and ranking figures as the provider’s account of one campaign, then ask what the same outreach would target on your pages.[9]

Compare the reported 75-link scale with the white-label terms on offer: no minimum and no contract lower the commitment, while the one-year replacement promise sets the remedy baseline.[9][11]

Lock the channel in scope

Confirm industry-publication and association targeting in the ordered scope, since the white-label product serves many industries and the logistics focus must be specified.[9][11]

Official homepageCompany profile
Rank 5

Searchbloom

PBS 62.7SFS 55.6OS 59.1Trustpilot 4.3/5 from 12 reviews, as of 05/09/2026
Searchbloom logo
Best for

Logistics brands bundling links into search programmes[7][8]

Introduction

Searchbloom is a full-service search agency whose stated industries include logistics, transportation and supply chain — covering trucking and freight, 3PL and fulfilment, warehousing, last-mile and freight technology. Links come from custom white-hat, content-driven campaigns plus digital PR that earns third-party coverage, with no PBNs and no marketplace inventory.[7][8]

What they do

Custom link building and digital PR sold as part of broader search programmes: geo- or industry-relevant placements earned through content, aimed at the logistics segments on the agency’s industries list. Digital PR covers the earned-media route for stories strong enough to win third-party coverage on their own.[7][8]

Our verdict

We recommend Searchbloom for logistics brands that want one search partner for rankings, content and links rather than a standalone placement vendor. Publicly accepting trucking, freight, 3PL and fulfilment removes the first qualification hurdle, and the white-hat, content-driven method avoids marketplace stock. The trade-off is specificity: no named logistics campaign and no lane-page workflow appear on the pages read, so ask for trade-journal targets, association angles and destination-page mapping in the proposal before signing.[7][8]

Strengths

  • An explicit industries list covering trucking, freight, 3PL, fulfilment, warehousing and last-mile.[7]
  • Industry-relevant white-hat earning through content and digital PR rather than marketplace inventory.[8]

Limitations

  • The case library on the pages read shows ecommerce, local and national work, not a logistics client.[7]
  • No link price, quota, approval right or remedy is published on the link-building page.[8]

Price and engagement

Exact public price unavailable — the offer is quote-led.[8]

Commitment, turnaround and purchased-service remedy are not stated on the pages read.[8]

Confirm scope before the proposal

Use the industries list to confirm 3PL, freight or trucking sits in scope, then ask for named trade-journal and association targets, since the link-building page names neither.[7][8]

Buy the programme, not the placement

There is no per-placement unit here, so compare Searchbloom on the search programme as a whole — content, digital PR and reporting — and get the link deliverables itemised in the quote.[8]

Fix reporting expectations before the start date — which links count and which pages they point to — since neither is published on the link-building page.[8]

Official homepageCompany profile
Rank 6

Ranko Media

PBS 55.5SFS 54.5OS 55.0
Ranko Media logo
Best for

Logistics sites commissioning white-hat outreach[17]

Introduction

Ranko Media offers monthly white-hat outreach to bloggers and journalists from its logistics page, covering guest blogging, digital PR, infographics and resource, broken-link and competitor outreach. It rules out PBNs and purchased links, and shows leads and placements in project-management reporting that keeps the campaign visible.[17]

What they do

White-hat cold-email outreach for logistics websites, spanning guest posts, infographics and resource and broken-link tactics. Project-management reporting of leads and placements keeps the monthly campaign visible.[17]

Our verdict

We recommend Ranko Media for logistics sites that want straightforward white-hat outreach with visible project reporting and will validate the scope on a call. Monthly blogger and journalist outreach with no PBNs is a sound starting shape. The trade-off is thinness: the page carries a leftover finance heading and non-logistics testimonials, so treat it as an industry offer URL rather than proof of a logistics campaign — and get outlet classes and destinations named before work starts.[17][18]

Strengths

  • A dedicated logistics service page spelling out monthly outreach tactics.[17]
  • An explicit no-PBN, no-purchased-links promise.[17]

Limitations

  • Testimonials are non-logistics and a leftover finance heading sits on the page — signs of a templated industry URL.[17]
  • No price is published, and the contact page did not load on the read date — confirm scope and terms on the introductory call.[17]

Price and engagement

Exact public price unavailable.[17]

Treat the URL as an offer, not proof

Read the logistics page as an industry offer with listed tactics rather than as evidence of a delivered logistics campaign, and ask for one before ordering.[17]

Ask for outlets and reporting

Ask which bloggers and journalists the monthly outreach would target and how leads and placements appear in project reporting.[17]

Official homepageCompany profile

Buyer guide

Start from a thin outlet pool

Logistics runs on a narrow shelf of trade press: freight and supply-chain titles, association journals and rate and capacity data reports, not the broad blog inventory behind generalist campaigns. Link Building HQ’s 3PL case shows the working mix — industry publications, supply-chain associations and directories — while B2BSEO.io publishes the same classes as its channel list.[9][15]

Shortlist providers that can name the publication and association classes they pitch, and deprioritise any plan that stops at domain metrics.

Data-led angles earn their place here: capacity, rates and compliance figures give trade editors a reason to cite a carrier that a generic guest post never will.

Put trucking here, not moving or dealerships

Trucking sits inside this ranking: Searchbloom’s industries list names trucking, freight, 3PL and fulfilment as served segments, and Click Intelligence scopes transport and freight the same way. Carriers, freight brokers and 3PLs commission here.[1][7]

Draw the boundary on both sides. Dealership and aftermarket businesses belong with automotive, while movers and self-storage sit in a separate long-tail industry with different outlets and intents — a mover should buy against that brief rather than this one.

Mixed businesses should split the brief: the outlets, associations and commercial pages differ by segment, and one campaign rarely serves two well.

Commission the money page, not the homepage

Point links at the pages that earn: lane and service pages, warehouse and 3PL capability pages, freight-forwarding descriptions and quote or RFQ routes. Version weights capability pages over the homepage, and B2BSEO.io maps lane, location and quote intent explicitly.[12][15]

List those destination URLs in the brief before outreach starts; retrofitting commercial targets onto placed links seldom works.

Where a provider cannot explain which of your pages takes direct links, treat that as a gap in the proposal, not in your site.

Ask for outlet classes by name

Ask for outlet classes by name: logistics and trade publications, supply-chain associations, business directories and data-led digital PR. B2BSEO.io publishes that full list, and Link Building HQ’s 3PL case reports links from the first three classes.[9][15]

Classes beat individual titles at proposal stage: titles change, but a provider committed to associations and trade press in writing can be held to it.

Beware the reverse: a plan that names impressive titles without a class commitment leaves no recourse when placements land elsewhere.

Choose a placement unit or a search programme

Click Intelligence sells a defined per-placement unit with a rendered £70 DR20+ price, while Searchbloom, Version and B2BSEO.io wrap links inside broader quoted search programmes. Neither shape is better in the abstract: a unit suits buyers who know their pages and outlets, while a programme suits buyers who need strategy first.[4][8][12][15]

Compare like with like: break retainers into their link deliverables before setting them against per-placement prices.

Get the deliverable in the order either way — placement counts, outlet classes and destinations — since headlines on both sides describe scopes, not promises.

Settle approval before safety is at stake

Pre-approval matters most where pages carry operating claims: on-time performance, licensed brokerage status or network authority. Click Intelligence is the only provider here with a stated site and content pre-approval option — if review rights matter elsewhere, write them into the order.[2]

Approval also protects the voice: guest articles and expert quotes under your brand should read like your operations team, not a template.

Put review rights, anchor rules and the remedy for misplaced links in the same order: approval without a correction path still leaves the buyer arguing after publication.

Budget from one rendered price, not headlines

Only Click Intelligence shows a rendered unit price this round — £70 per DR20+ non-approval placement with volume breaks — while every other provider quotes custom scope. Set budgets as ranges until quotes return, not from headline figures.[4][8]

Confirm what sits outside the figure before comparing: approval toggles, content, VAT and non-UK billing treatment all move the invoiced total.[4]

Ask whether replacement cover and content revisions sit inside the quoted figure or bill separately — the cheapest headline rarely stays cheapest once the extras land.

Read case numbers as provider reports

Link Building HQ’s 75 links and traffic growth and Version’s fulfilment rankings and AI citations are the providers’ own accounts, not independent tests. They show what each provider chose to publish, not what your campaign will produce.[9][12]

Ask for the measurement behind any case you lean on — baseline dates, included work and attribution boundaries — and agree the same measures for your own order.

Keep provider reports and your own analytics apart: a case shows what one provider chose to publish about one client, while your dashboards show what the spend did for you.

FAQs

What is a logistics link building service?

A managed service that acquires third-party links or earns digital-PR coverage for freight, 3PL, trucking, supply-chain and fulfilment sites. Click Intelligence fulfils it with blogger outreach and guest articles, while Ranko Media runs monthly blogger and journalist outreach with digital PR. Expect quote-led scoping everywhere except the one per-placement shop.[1][4][8][17]

Why are associations important for logistics links?

Trade publications reach buyers, but associations and directories carry the sector’s trust — carriers check member lists and partner pages before shortlisting. Link Building HQ’s 3PL case secured links from supply-chain associations alongside industry publications, which is exactly the mix to ask for.[9][15]

Start the outlet conversation with associations and directories, then layer trade-press outreach on top — the mix in the 3PL case, not one channel alone.[9]

Can trucking companies use this ranking?

Yes. Trucking is absorbed into this logistics ranking rather than automotive: carriers, freight and 3PL buyers commission here, with Searchbloom naming trucking and Click Intelligence scoping transport and freight explicitly. Automotive covers dealerships and aftermarket businesses instead.[1][7]

Is moving or self-storage included?

No. Moving and self-storage sit in a separate long-tail industry with different outlets and intents, so a mover should buy against that brief rather than this one. Outlets, associations and commercial intents differ by segment, so a mover buying here would pay for the wrong channel.

What should we send a provider before ordering?

Service lines, lanes and hubs, the target URLs and any compliance claims that must stay accurate. B2BSEO.io’s page is built around lane, location and quote intent, and Version weights capability pages — both need your commercial pages to plan against.[12][15]

Add your approval needs and the outlet classes you expect; both shape the quote more than the link count does.

Do we need site approval?

Where pages carry operating or licensed-status claims, insist on reviewing sites and content before placement. Click Intelligence offers pre-approval as an order option; approval elsewhere is unstated, so write it into the order wherever you need it. Guest articles and expert quotes under your brand should read like your operations team, so review content as well as sites.[2]

What does a logistics placement cost?

One rendered figure exists: £70 per DR20+ non-approval placement at Click Intelligence, with breaks at higher volumes. Every other provider here quotes custom scope, so treat any budget as a range until your quote returns. Volume breaks apply at Click Intelligence; approval, content and tax treatment sit outside the unit figure.[4][8]

Are PBN offers eligible for this ranking?

No. This ranking covers editorial outreach and earned coverage only; the one freight page found offering private-network placements as an advanced option was excluded. Providers here state the opposite promise — Link Building HQ and Ranko Media both rule out PBNs. Ask any shortlisted provider to state its position in the order if the promise matters to you.[11][17][19]

Will these links produce quote requests?

No independent test on this page connects placements to quote or RFQ volume. The traffic and ranking figures from Link Building HQ and Version are provider reports — useful for judging activity, not proof of your return.[9][12]

Agree quote-page measurement in your own order instead: baselines, included work and attribution boundaries, in writing before outreach starts.

How this ranking is built

This ranking compares 6 providers.

Two scores produce this ranking: the Provider Buyer Score from our M1.3 methodology, and the Service Fit Score from this page’s fixed logistics rubric — campaign deliverable 0.16, trade-press and association channel fit 0.18, lane and commercial-page targeting 0.14, demonstrated logistics delivery 0.12, logistics content and data expertise 0.12, geographic targeting 0.10, placement control 0.10, outcome measurement 0.08. The Overall Score is the geometric mean of the two: sqrt(Provider Buyer Score × Service Fit Score). Every provider fact comes from the provider’s own current pages, read on 6 September 2026. Full method: /methodology/.[20]

The full method is on the methodology page.

Summary

Provider Buyer Score (PBS) is the sum of the eight weighted buyer criteria. Service Fit Score (SFS) is the sum of the exact production contributions shown for this page. Overall Score is sqrt(PBS × SFS). Rank and tie status come from the production store.

Criteria and weights

Provider Buyer Score criteria

CriterionWeight
B1 — Deliverable quality and buyer fit0.25 (25%)
B2 — Value for money0.2 (20%)
B3 — Delivery reliability and buyer protection0.15 (15%)
B4 — Customer reviews0.15 (15%)
B5 — Managed service, support, and buyer control0.1 (10%)
B6 — Commercial terms and flexibility0.07 (7%)
B7 — Reporting and transparency0.05 (5%)
B8 — Continuity and capacity0.03 (3%)

Service Fit criteria

CriterionWeight
L1 — Logistics campaign deliverable0.16 (16%)
L2 — Trade-press, association and data-report channel fit0.18 (18%)
L3 — Lane, service-line and commercial-page targeting0.14 (14%)
L4 — Demonstrated logistics delivery0.12 (12%)
L5 — Logistics content and data expertise0.12 (12%)
L6 — Multi-market, terminal and route geographic targeting0.1 (10%)
L7 — Placement control and follow0.1 (10%)
L8 — Logistics outcome measurement0.08 (8%)

Score calculations

Click Intelligence — Rank 1

PBS 73.0SFS 57.4Overall 64.7

Provider Buyer Score inputs

CriterionWeightScoreWeighted contribution
B1 — Deliverable quality and buyer fit0.2575.7518.9375
B2 — Value for money0.284.772833397006716.9545666794013
B3 — Delivery reliability and buyer protection0.1570.510.575
B4 — Customer reviews0.1556.66678.500005
B5 — Managed service, support, and buyer control0.178.757.875
B6 — Commercial terms and flexibility0.0764.254.4975
B7 — Reporting and transparency0.0567.53.375
B8 — Continuity and capacity0.03752.25

PBS = Σ weighted B contributions = 72.9645716794013 → displayed 73.0

Service Fit inputs

CriterionWeightRaw scoreEvidence factorAdjusted scoreWeighted contribution
L1 — Logistics campaign deliverable0.16800.6569.511.12
L2 — Trade-press, association and data-report channel fit0.18550.4529.36
L3 — Lane, service-line and commercial-page targeting0.14500507
L4 — Demonstrated logistics delivery0.12550.4526.24
L5 — Logistics content and data expertise0.12550.4526.24
L6 — Multi-market, terminal and route geographic targeting0.1750.6566.256.625
L7 — Placement control and follow0.187.50.48333333333333368.1256.8125
L8 — Logistics outcome measurement0.08500504

Adjusted score = 50 + factor × (raw score − 50); weighted contribution = weight × adjusted score. SFS = Σ weighted S contributions = 57.3975 → displayed 57.4

Overall = sqrt(PBS × SFS) = sqrt(72.9645716794013 × 57.3975) = 64.7146351528651 → displayed 64.7

Version — Rank 2

PBS 61.0SFS 64.5Overall 62.7

Provider Buyer Score inputs

CriterionWeightScoreWeighted contribution
B1 — Deliverable quality and buyer fit0.2573.7518.4375
B2 — Value for money0.25010
B3 — Delivery reliability and buyer protection0.15578.55
B4 — Customer reviews0.15507.5
B5 — Managed service, support, and buyer control0.168.756.875
B6 — Commercial terms and flexibility0.07674.69
B7 — Reporting and transparency0.0563.753.1875
B8 — Continuity and capacity0.03601.8

PBS = Σ weighted B contributions = 61.04 → displayed 61.0

Service Fit inputs

CriterionWeightRaw scoreEvidence factorAdjusted scoreWeighted contribution
L1 — Logistics campaign deliverable0.16850.6572.7511.64
L2 — Trade-press, association and data-report channel fit0.18750.6566.2511.925
L3 — Lane, service-line and commercial-page targeting0.14850.6572.7510.185
L4 — Demonstrated logistics delivery0.12600.6556.56.78
L5 — Logistics content and data expertise0.12600.6556.56.78
L6 — Multi-market, terminal and route geographic targeting0.1750.6566.256.625
L7 — Placement control and follow0.1750.4606
L8 — Logistics outcome measurement0.08600.6556.54.52

Adjusted score = 50 + factor × (raw score − 50); weighted contribution = weight × adjusted score. SFS = Σ weighted S contributions = 64.455 → displayed 64.5

Overall = sqrt(PBS × SFS) = sqrt(61.04 × 64.455) = 62.7242632479649 → displayed 62.7

B2BSEO.io — Rank 3

PBS 57.0SFS 66.4Overall 61.5

Provider Buyer Score inputs

CriterionWeightScoreWeighted contribution
B1 — Deliverable quality and buyer fit0.2572.118.025
B2 — Value for money0.25010
B3 — Delivery reliability and buyer protection0.1549.77.455
B4 — Customer reviews0.15507.5
B5 — Managed service, support, and buyer control0.161.456.145
B6 — Commercial terms and flexibility0.0751.43.598
B7 — Reporting and transparency0.0552.552.6275
B8 — Continuity and capacity0.0355.71.671

PBS = Σ weighted B contributions = 57.0215 → displayed 57.0

Service Fit inputs

CriterionWeightRaw scoreEvidence factorAdjusted scoreWeighted contribution
L1 — Logistics campaign deliverable0.16800.6569.511.12
L2 — Trade-press, association and data-report channel fit0.18900.657613.68
L3 — Lane, service-line and commercial-page targeting0.14850.6572.7510.185
L4 — Demonstrated logistics delivery0.12500506
L5 — Logistics content and data expertise0.12750.6566.257.95
L6 — Multi-market, terminal and route geographic targeting0.1850.6572.757.275
L7 — Placement control and follow0.1750.4606
L8 — Logistics outcome measurement0.08550.4524.16

Adjusted score = 50 + factor × (raw score − 50); weighted contribution = weight × adjusted score. SFS = Σ weighted S contributions = 66.37 → displayed 66.4

Overall = sqrt(PBS × SFS) = sqrt(57.0215 × 66.37) = 61.518427767621 → displayed 61.5

Link Building HQ — Rank 4

PBS 55.5SFS 65.4Overall 60.3

Provider Buyer Score inputs

CriterionWeightScoreWeighted contribution
B1 — Deliverable quality and buyer fit0.2568.317.075
B2 — Value for money0.25010
B3 — Delivery reliability and buyer protection0.1546.77.005
B4 — Customer reviews0.15507.5
B5 — Managed service, support, and buyer control0.157.55.75
B6 — Commercial terms and flexibility0.0748.63.402
B7 — Reporting and transparency0.0561.73.085
B8 — Continuity and capacity0.0356.61.698

PBS = Σ weighted B contributions = 55.515 → displayed 55.5

Service Fit inputs

CriterionWeightRaw scoreEvidence factorAdjusted scoreWeighted contribution
L1 — Logistics campaign deliverable0.16800.6569.511.12
L2 — Trade-press, association and data-report channel fit0.18850.6572.7513.095
L3 — Lane, service-line and commercial-page targeting0.14800.6569.59.73
L4 — Demonstrated logistics delivery0.12600.6556.56.78
L5 — Logistics content and data expertise0.12700.65637.56
L6 — Multi-market, terminal and route geographic targeting0.1750.6566.256.625
L7 — Placement control and follow0.1750.4606
L8 — Logistics outcome measurement0.08600.6556.54.52

Adjusted score = 50 + factor × (raw score − 50); weighted contribution = weight × adjusted score. SFS = Σ weighted S contributions = 65.43 → displayed 65.4

Overall = sqrt(PBS × SFS) = sqrt(55.515 × 65.43) = 60.2689509615026 → displayed 60.3

Searchbloom — Rank 5

PBS 62.7SFS 55.6Overall 59.1

Provider Buyer Score inputs

CriterionWeightScoreWeighted contribution
B1 — Deliverable quality and buyer fit0.256917.25
B2 — Value for money0.25010
B3 — Delivery reliability and buyer protection0.15507.5
B4 — Customer reviews0.157611.4
B5 — Managed service, support, and buyer control0.174.757.475
B6 — Commercial terms and flexibility0.07573.99
B7 — Reporting and transparency0.05633.15
B8 — Continuity and capacity0.0364.251.9275

PBS = Σ weighted B contributions = 62.6925 → displayed 62.7

Service Fit inputs

CriterionWeightRaw scoreEvidence factorAdjusted scoreWeighted contribution
L1 — Logistics campaign deliverable0.16700.656310.08
L2 — Trade-press, association and data-report channel fit0.18700.656311.34
L3 — Lane, service-line and commercial-page targeting0.14500507
L4 — Demonstrated logistics delivery0.12500506
L5 — Logistics content and data expertise0.12500506
L6 — Multi-market, terminal and route geographic targeting0.1550.4525.2
L7 — Placement control and follow0.1750.4606
L8 — Logistics outcome measurement0.08500504

Adjusted score = 50 + factor × (raw score − 50); weighted contribution = weight × adjusted score. SFS = Σ weighted S contributions = 55.62 → displayed 55.6

Overall = sqrt(PBS × SFS) = sqrt(62.6925 × 55.62) = 59.0504602014243 → displayed 59.1

Ranko Media — Rank 6

PBS 55.5SFS 54.5Overall 55.0

Provider Buyer Score inputs

CriterionWeightScoreWeighted contribution
B1 — Deliverable quality and buyer fit0.2563.5515.8875
B2 — Value for money0.25010
B3 — Delivery reliability and buyer protection0.1551.57.725
B4 — Customer reviews0.15507.5
B5 — Managed service, support, and buyer control0.1626.2
B6 — Commercial terms and flexibility0.0752.53.675
B7 — Reporting and transparency0.0559.62.98
B8 — Continuity and capacity0.0350.11.503

PBS = Σ weighted B contributions = 55.4705 → displayed 55.5

Service Fit inputs

CriterionWeightRaw scoreEvidence factorAdjusted scoreWeighted contribution
L1 — Logistics campaign deliverable0.16700.656310.08
L2 — Trade-press, association and data-report channel fit0.18600.6556.510.17
L3 — Lane, service-line and commercial-page targeting0.14500507
L4 — Demonstrated logistics delivery0.12500506
L5 — Logistics content and data expertise0.12550.4526.24
L6 — Multi-market, terminal and route geographic targeting0.1500505
L7 — Placement control and follow0.1750.4606
L8 — Logistics outcome measurement0.08500504

Adjusted score = 50 + factor × (raw score − 50); weighted contribution = weight × adjusted score. SFS = Σ weighted S contributions = 54.49 → displayed 54.5

Overall = sqrt(PBS × SFS) = sqrt(55.4705 × 54.49) = 54.9780642165582 → displayed 55.0

Rules and dates

  • Ties: providers are grouped when their Overall Score gap from the group leader is below 0.5; tied providers are ordered alphabetically. Rank and tie status above are store-derived.
  • Conflicts: the most buyer-favourable specific current public promise that would reasonably form part of the purchase is credited. The conflict is recorded unless the versions can be reconciled; the same promise is not counted twice.
  • Display rounding: PBS, SFS, and Overall Score are calculated from unrounded production values and displayed to one decimal place.
  • Evidence cutoff: 2026-09-06. Page last updated: 2026-09-06.

Editorial standards and corrections

Every provider fact on this page cites that provider’s own current pages, read on 6 September 2026 and dated in the source list. Where a provider has not published a term, the page says the exact figure is unavailable — an absent term is not a bad term.

The Service Fit Score is the weighted sum of the eight logistics criterion scores, computed with no intermediate rounding; the Overall Score is sqrt(Provider Buyer Score × Service Fit Score), displayed to one decimal.

Providers are ordered by exact Overall Score. A provider joins the group above it only when its gap from that group’s leader is strictly below 0.5; tied providers share a rank and appear alphabetically, and the next rank counts every provider above it.

The page credits the most buyer-favourable specific current promise; where current pages conflict, only that item is treated as less settled, never the whole provider. Dated later terms supersede older pages. Provider-reported campaign results are attributed and capped, never independently verified outcomes. Evidence cutoff: 6 September 2026; this page was last updated on 6 September 2026.

Spot an error? Every provider profile on this site carries a Request a change form, and anyone — provider or reader — can submit evidence through it. We acknowledge within 5 working days and respond substantively within 20. Successful corrections produce a corrected record and a dated public correction note.

Click Intelligence advertises a money-back promise on up to 10 shop placements and a lifetime link guarantee, but the terms extract read this round emphasises non-refundable fees and was truncated before the replacement clauses. Treat both remedies as qualified until the written order restates which wording governs.[4][5]

Sources

  1. 1Click Intelligence Transport, Logistics & Freight SEO & PPChttps://www.clickintelligence.com/seo/agency/transport-logistics-freight/Checked 2026-09-06
  2. 2Click Intelligence UK Blogger Outreachhttps://www.clickintelligence.co.uk/blogger-outreach/Checked 2026-09-06
  3. 3Click Intelligence UK Link Buildinghttps://www.clickintelligence.co.uk/link-building/Checked 2026-09-06
  4. 4Click Intelligence Blogger Outreach shophttps://app.clickintelligence.com/en-gb/link-building/blogger-outreach/Checked 2026-09-06
  5. 5Click Intelligence Terms and Conditions (updated 29 October 2025)https://www.clickintelligence.com/our-terms-conditions/Checked 2026-09-06
  6. 6Best Link Building Companies For Logistics Businesses (Click Intelligence listicle)https://www.clickintelligence.com/guides/agency-lists-us/link-building/best-link-building-companies-for-logistics-businesses/Checked 2026-09-06
  7. 7Searchbloom official AI information / industries servedhttps://www.searchbloom.com/ai-information/Checked 2026-09-06
  8. 8Searchbloom Link Building Serviceshttps://www.searchbloom.com/link-building/Checked 2026-09-06
  9. 9LBHQ logistics / 3PL matching platform case studyhttps://www.linkbuildinghq.com/case-studies/how-we-helped-a-logistics-company-dominate-search-rankings/Checked 2026-09-06
  10. 10Link Building HQ homepagehttps://www.linkbuildinghq.com/Checked 2026-09-06
  11. 11LBHQ white-label link buildinghttps://www.linkbuildinghq.com/white-label-link-building/Checked 2026-09-06
  12. 12Version logistics / 3PL SEO and backlinkshttps://version.so/logistics/Checked 2026-09-06
  13. 13Version.so homepagehttps://version.so/Checked 2026-09-06
  14. 14Version.so contacthttps://version.so/contact/Checked 2026-09-06
  15. 15B2BSEO.io logistics SEO serviceshttps://b2bseo.io/services/logistics-seo/Checked 2026-09-06
  16. 16B2BSEO.io homepagehttps://b2bseo.io/Checked 2026-09-06
  17. 17Ranko Media logistics link building serviceshttps://rankomedia.com/logistics-link-building-services/Checked 2026-09-06
  18. 18Ranko Media backlink outreach serviceshttps://rankomedia.com/link-building-services/Checked 2026-09-06
  19. 19The Trust Agency freight companies link building (PBN option)https://thetrustagency.net/solution/freight-companies-link-building-serviceChecked 2026-09-06
  20. 20Link Building Rankings methodologyhttps://www.linkbuildingrankings.com/methodology/Checked 2026-09-06